Chapter Study Outline


Although recent presidents have encountered numerous political troubles, the institution of the American presidency has grown in power and prominence over the past century. Designed as a unitary office, the presidency possesses a capacity for quick decision and action. In the twentieth century, a strong executive emerged and was institutionalized in American national politics as the power of the president, the office of the presidency and the executive branch, and popular expectations for strong presidential leadership all increased. Even though the framers anticipated that Congress would be the predominant branch of government, things have changed. Contemporary presidents wield formidable formal and informal resources of governance.

  1. The Constitutional Basis of the Presidency
    What was the character of the presidency that the Constitution established? How did the process of presidential selection help to define this character? How have changes in presidential selection affected presidential leadership?
    • Article II of the Constitution vested the executive power in an independent, unitary president of the United States. Although some delegates to the Constitutional Convention favored a multi-person “executive council,” most framers thought a unitary (single-person) executive was preferable because it could take quick and aggressive action.
    • Much of Article II is devoted to setting forth how the president will be selected. As opposed to Congress or the people selecting the president, the Constitution established the electoral college as an indirect means of electing the president, thus making the executive responsible to the state and national legislators rather than to the electorate.


  2. The Constitutional Powers of the Presidency
    With what types of constitutional powers is the president endowed? How have these powers changed over time?
    • Scholars cite three main types of presidential powers: expressed powers, delegated powers, and inherent powers.
      • Expressed powers are those powers specifically granted to the president in Article II, Sections 2 and 3, of the Constitution.
      • Given that Article II declares that the president “shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,” when Congress enacts laws, it delegates power to the president and the executive branch to implement its will; such delegated powers constitute an important, expandable source of presidential strength.
      • Inherent powers are those that presidents claim that are not expressed in the Constitution but are inferred from it; they are most often asserted during times of war or national emergency.
    • The president’s expressed powers, as defined by Article II, Sections 2 and 3, include military, judicial, diplomatic, executive, and legislative powers.
      • As “Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States,” the president possesses military powers and heads the nation’s security and intelligence agencies; these powers also include deploying troops to enforce federal decisions and declarations of states of emergency. In response to presidential unilateralism, in 1973 Congress passed the War Powers Resolution.
      • The president exercises judicial power when he or she grants pardons, reprieves, and amnesty.
      • As head of state, the president has the diplomatic powers to make treaties (though their ratification requires Senate approval), receive ambassadors, and create executive agreements.
      • The president also possesses executive powers that include the duty to see that all laws are faithfully executed and the power to appoint principal executive officers and federal judges (though this requires Senate approval); as chief executive, the president enjoys a power known as “executive privilege,” which makes confidential the communications between the president and his or her advisers and adds to executive power.
      • Charged by the Constitution with “giv[ing] to the Congress Information of the State of the Union” and the power to veto legislation, presidents also have powers in the legislative process; these legislative powers have been transformed and expanded to include legislative initiative, the ability to bring a legislative agenda before Congress, and the issuance of executive orders that instruct the executive branch and often have the effect of legislation. For example, soon after taking office, President Barack Obama seized the initiative in presenting Congress with a budget proposal designed to address America’s financial crisis and recessed economy.


  3. The Rise of Presidential Government
    What was the president’s role during the era of legislative supremacy from 1800 to 1933? How did Franklin Roosevelt transform the power of the presidency and facilitate the rise of presidential government?
    • Consistent with the Constitution’s clear intent of legislative supremacy, the nineteenth and early twentieth century are characterized as a “Legislative Epoch” in which American government was deemed by Woodrow Wilson to be “Congressional Government” and in which presidents were often seen as little more than “chief clerks” implementing Congress’s will.
    • Not linked to or representative of major national and social forces, the nineteenth-century presidency left only occasional room for presidential greatness.
    • The rise of national conventions in the 1830s strengthened the office somewhat, though Congress kept a tight rein on powers of the presidency.
    • The modern presidency began with Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR), who in his first 100 days in office took the reins of the executive branch and eventually promoted policies in Congress that transformed the size and character of American national government.
    • These newly passed programs provided for national government intervention in American economic life and challenged the traditional balance of power in federalism and the separation of powers.
      • FDR’s New Deal programs took decisive action to expand the role of the national government.
      • Increased congressional delegation led to enhanced executive powers, and the Supreme Court eventually upheld the New Deal’s federalism changes and broad delegations. Power was given to FDR because of the economic crisis of the Great Depression.


  4. Presidential Government
    With the locus of policy decision-making shifting from the Congress to the executive branch, how is presidential government performed and legitimated? What are the formal resources of presidential power? What are the contemporary political bases of presidential government? And how do presidents lead the expanded administrative state?
    • Presidential government is based, in part, on a number of formal, institutional resources including the Cabinet, the White House staff, the executive office of the president, and the vice presidency.
      • The secretaries of the major departments of the national government constitute the president’s cabinet of advisers, which serves as a source of political support and policy coordination and advice; an “inner cabinet” in the National Security Council was established in 1947 and provides the president with expert intelligence and foreign policy advice.
      • The White House staff of analysts and advisers to the president is an important source of information and a management tool for presidents seeking to control the broader executive branch.
      • The Executive Office of the President (EOP) is part of the broader group of permanent agencies that perform management tasks for the president; the largest and most important of these agencies is the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
      • The vice president and the office of the vice presidency serve as important political and management resources for the institutional presidency, too.
      • Taken collectively, the president’s institutional resources have helped presidents gain greater control over public policy decisions in the legislative and administrative processes.
    • Contemporary presidents have expanded their power by three chief means: party, popular mobilization, and administration.
      • Presidents rely on their own party as a source of power, often calling upon partisan institutions and leaders to exert influence in the legislative process. Presidents often face difficulties during periods of divided government, when the other party controls at least one of the two chambers of Congress.
      • “Going public” is a term referring to modern presidents’ use of the mass media to appeal directly to the electorate for support on a particular issue; critics claim that this has led to a permanent campaign in the presidential leadership.
    • Employing various forms of leverage over the expanded administrative state, contemporary presidents seek to influence policy and govern sometimes even without congressional, partisan, or public support.
      • Increasing the reach and power of the Executive Office of the President, presidents seek to control the executive branch, particularly through OMB’s ability to approve or disapprove of federal agencies’ spending requests.
      • Exerting similar review over agencies’ abilities to propose and promulgate regulatory rules, as well as by appointing loyal supporters to top jobs, the White House has increased its control over the federal bureaucracy.
      • Expanding the use of executive orders and other instruments of direct presidential governance, contemporary presidents do a great deal of governing “by decree.”
      • In recent years, presidents have used signing statements, policy statements made when the president signs a bill into law, to shape the interpretation and implementation of laws passed by Congress. Although signing statements have a longer history, presidents since Ronald Reagan have used them to affect policy; this practice and the controversies surrounding it reached a high point during the administration of George W. Bush.


  5. Is the Presidency Too Strong?
    The unitary executive branch of the presidency was thought to make the presidency more energetic. However, the president is checked by the other branches of government. Does this make the presidency strong or weak?
    • While historians and journalists often compare past presidents’ relative levels of strength, today every president is strong. This is due less to the personal charisma of the individual presidents than to their increasing powers.
    • The decline of voting, especially in non-presidential election years, has reduced congressional influence while enhancing the power of the presidency.
    • One example of recent expansion of presidential power was in October 2002, when Congress allowed President George W. Bush complete discretion to determine whether, when, and how to attack Iraq. In the larger view, presidents’ occasional defeats have been temporary setbacks in a gradual increase of presidential power.