|
 |
Arguing a Position
|
|
Stages of Argument—Peter Suber, Earlham College
Proposes and explains four tiers of argument sophistication.
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/courses/argstages.htm
|
|
Enhancing Deliberation Through Computer-Supported Argument Visualization—Tim van Gelder, University of Melbourne
Proposes visual argument mapping as both superior to verbal argument and a great aid in refining verbal argument.
http://www.philosophy.unimelb.edu.au/reason/
papers/Enhancing_Deliberation.pdf
|
|
Argument, Rhetoric, and Writing—Arkansas State University Composition Handbook
General introduction, brief discussions of ethos, audience, and logic.
http://www.clt.astate.edu/composition/arg,%20rhet,%20writ.htm
|
|
Links to Rhetoric, Argument, and Logical Fallacy Sites—Wright State University
http://www.wright.edu/cola/Dept/eng/composition/rhet_fallacies.htm
|
|
An Outline of the Anita Hill and Clarence Thomas Controversy—George Mason University
Background, commentary, testimony, gender/race/media perspectives.
http://chnm.gmu.edu/courses/122/hill/hillframe.htm
|
|
The Enola Gay Controversy—Lehigh University
Discussion and primary resources track the history of the Smithsonian exhibit controversy.
http://www.lehigh.edu/~ineng/enola/
|
|
Commonwealth Institute—non-profit public policy institute, Cambridge, MA
Features "Project on Defense Alternatives" with reviews and documents detailing Iraq War strategies, developments, factors in decision-making and The Pulse of Capitalism, a newsletter with a global perspective of economic indicators and analysis.
http://www.comw.org/index.html
|
|
NATO Expansion: A Problem or a Solution—Earlham College Presents European and Western views.
http://www.earlham.edu/%7Epols/ps17971/blinnro/index.html
|
Nuclearfiles.org—Nuclear Age Peace Foundation
Resources for researching nuclear disarmament issues, including history, ethics, documents, biographies of key players, current research, study guides.
http://www.nuclearfiles.org/
|
|